Many researchers responded to our Covid19 call for papers, blogs, and research projects. Please see the contributions of CEITR affiliates at this page.
We greatly appreciate all these wonderful contributions.
Thought leadership provides a useful lens for evaluating the significance of CEITR projects for both the University of Phoenix and the community of scholars. Midgley (2017) characterizes thought leaders as judicious, collegial, and proficient in motivating others. Classen and Alvarez (2017) suggest thought leaders identify and catalyze community needs into viable action plans. Drawing upon the work of others (Brousseau & Kawasaki, 2013; Male & Palaiologou, 2015), Nagyová et al. (2016) portray thought leadership as a pedagogical approach and delineate a seven-step model:
CEITR’s Dissertation to Publication programs operationalize thought leadership as a pedagogical approach:
CEITR's Dissertation to Publication programs align with the seven-step thought leadership model (Nagyová et al., 2016):
Step 1 - Identify a topic of interest
According to Provost Curley’s “Scholarship Engagement Overview for Faculty" message, dated June 27, 2017, and the Deans of Faculty “Scholarship Engagement Expectations for Graduate Faculty” message, dated June 30, 2017:
The Higher Learning Commission (HLC) has issued new faculty qualification guidelines stipulating “instructors teaching in graduate programs should…have a record of…scholarship” appropriate for the discipline in which they teach. These new guidelines impact all institutions under HLC accreditation. In support of the University’s Scholarship Mission and Vision, scholarship expectations for faculty have been updated as follows:
CEITR's Dissertation to Publication programs directly address HLC guidelines and the University’s Scholarship Mission and Vision by engaging the faculty as well as graduated students in scholarly activities and learning about the skill of publishing their studies.
Step 2 - Network with like-minded people
Graduate faculty who plan to continue teaching graduate level courses are considering scholarship strategies aligned with their research interests. However, in the online environment, many faculty are unsure where to begin or how to get started. CEITR’s Dissertation to Publication programs comprise human interaction, a scarce and welcome resource in the virtual environment.
Step 3 - Incentivize first followers
CEITR’s “Individual Support” program helps graduate faculty execute their scholarship strategies by providing one-on-one support for developing journal-appropriate content aligned with their research interests.
Step 4 - Failure is not an option
Faculty retention is requisite to the student retention, completion, and persistence intrinsic to the University’s mission. CEITR’s Dissertation to Publication programs enhance scholarly achievements and professional lives of students and faculty and improve students’ retention.
Step 5 - Create a model that can be conveyed to others
Serving doctoral and graduate faculty, CEITR’s “Individual Support” and "Dissertation to Publication" workshop program empower faculty to execute scholarship strategies by providing one-on-one support for developing journal-appropriate content aligned with their research interests.
Step 6 – Promote the idea
CEITR’s “Individual Support” and "Dissertation to Publication" workshop program are being introduced to the Deans of Faculty and School of Advanced Studies alumni.
Step 7 – Get started
Action speaks louder than words. CEITR's Dissertation to Publication Workshop was launched in January 2017 and are being monitored to optimize performance. CEITR's individual support for publication was launched in 2015.
In conclusion, CEITR’s Dissertation to Publication programs provide a thought leadership model for expanding the community of scholars within the University of Phoenix and beyond.
Comments, recommendations, and suggestions on ways to optimize these resources are welcome!
Brosseau, D., & Kawasaki, G. (2013). Ready to be a thought leader? How to increase your influence, impact, and success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Classen, S., & Alvarez, L. (2017, January). Reflecting and refocusing: Responsibilities of thought leadership. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health,37(1), 3-4. doi: 10.1177/1539449216683055
Male, T. & Palaiologou, I. (2015). Pedagogical leadership in the 21st century: Evidence from the field. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(2), 214–231.
Midgley, M. (2017). Thought leadership. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management, 37(1), 5.
Nagyová, L., Horská, E., Košičiarová, I., & Moroz, S. (2016). Thought leadership as an innovative way of teaching. Scientific Paper: International Scientific Days 2016. The Agri-Food Value Chain: Challenges for Natural Resources Management and Society, 640-651. Retrieved from http://www.slpk.sk/eldo/2016/dl/9788055215037/files/08/nagyova-et-al.html doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15414/isd2016.s8.10